Design a Proposed Framework for the Digitalization of Building Permit Regulations and the Enhancement of Licensing Procedures in Libya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/sjh.2.1.191Keywords:
Digital Building Permit, Digital Government, Digital Governance, Libya, BIM, GISAbstract
This study aims to develop a proposed framework for the digitalization of building permit regulations and the improvement of licensing procedures in Libya in response to the inefficiencies of the current permitting system, including fragmented institutional responsibilities, lengthy administrative procedures, paper-based documentation, and limited interoperability among public agencies. The study adopts a qualitative research approach and employs the Design Science Research (DSR) methodology to develop a conceptual framework integrating legislative, organizational, technological, and governance dimensions. The framework is informed by a comprehensive review of recent literature on digital government, digital governance, digital building permits, Building Information Modeling (BIM), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and international best practices. The findings indicate that successful digital transformation of building permit systems requires legislative reform, business process reengineering, integrated digital platforms, institutional interoperability, and performance measurement mechanisms. The proposed framework offers a practical roadmap for supporting digital transformation and improving the efficiency, transparency, and sustainability of Libya’s building permit system (OECD, 2020; Noardo et al., 2022; Ataide et al., 2023).
References
1. Ataide, M., Braholli, O., & Siegele, D. (2023). Digital transformation of building permits: Current status, maturity, and future prospects. Buildings, 13(10), 2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102554
2. Bloch, T., & Fauth, J. (2023). The unbalanced research on digitalization and automation of the building permitting process. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 58, 102188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102188
3. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., & Reijers, H. A. (2018). Fundamentals of Business Process Management (2nd ed.). Springer.
4. Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2018). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Designers, Engineers, Contractors, and Facility Managers (3rd ed.). Wiley.
5. European Commission. (2023). State of the Art of the Digitalisation of the Building Sector. Publications Office of the European Union.
6. Fauth, J., Pasetti Monizza, G., & Malacarne, G. (2023). Understanding processes on digital building permits: A case study in South Tyrol. Building Research & Information, 51(5), 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2023.2178372
7. Fauth, J., Bloch, T., Noardo, F., Nisbet, N., Kaiser, S. B., Gade, P. N., & Tekavec, J. (2024). Taxonomy for building permit system: Organizing knowledge for building permit digitalization. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 59, 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102312
8. Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (2006). Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution (Revised and Updated ed.). Harper Business.
9. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
10. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018a). ISO 19650-1: Organization and Digitization of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works, Including Building Information Modelling (BIM)—Part 1: Concepts and Principles. ISO.
11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018b). ISO 19650-2: Organization and Digitization of Information about Buildings and Civil Engineering Works, Including Building Information Modelling (BIM)—Part 2: Delivery Phase of the Assets. ISO.
12. Noardo, F., Guler, D., Fauth, J., Malacarne, G., Mastrolembo Ventura, S., Azenha, M., Olsson, P. O., & Senger, L. (2022). Unveiling the actual progress of digital building permit: Getting awareness through a critical state-of-the-art review. Building and Environment, 213, 108854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108854
13. OECD. (2020). The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six Dimensions of a Digital Government. OECD Publishing.
14. OECD. (2020). Digital Government Index: 2019 Results. OECD Publishing.
15. OECD. (2023). Government at a Glance 2023. OECD Publishing.
16. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.
17. United Nations. (2024). United Nations E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
18. UN-Habitat. (2022). People-Centered Smart Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
19. World Bank. (2021). GovTech Maturity Index: The State of Public Sector Digital Transformation. World Bank.
20. World Bank. (2024). Building Green: Unlocking Efficiency—The Global Landscape of Building Energy Regulations and Their Enforcement. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shihab Journal of Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shihab Journal of Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
