Risk Drivers and Safety Improvement Strategies in Gas Power Operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65405/sjh.2.4.179Keywords:
Gas Power Operations; Health and Safety, Environmental (HSE); Safety Management Systems.Abstract
Gas power facilities are among the more hazardous settings in modern industry. Workers, contractors, and site visitors face serious physical risks daily, from mechanical energy release to fall hazards and line-of-fire exposures. Controlling those risks requires a Health and Safety, Environmental system that works in the field—one that coordinates engineering controls, administrative procedures, and personal protective equipment (PPE) rather than treating them as independent layers.
This paper examines the safety framework applied in gas power operations across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) regions. It pays particular attention to Life-Saving Rules (LSRs), which were drawn from historical incident data and Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to target the activities most often linked to fatal and life-altering injuries. The study draws on 202 occupational records, of which 38 were operational incidents relevant to causal analysis. It identifies the principal drivers of Class A (fatal) and Class B (life-threatening or permanently disabling) events and evaluates how engineering barriers, administrative controls, and PPE held up in each case. Three activities—uncontrolled mechanical energy release, working at heights, and mechanical lifting—account for the majority of severe outcomes. Administrative controls failed more often than any other layer, at 55.3% of incidents, despite documented procedures and established LSRs being in place. The data points to a persistent gap between what is written in the safety system and what supervisors enforce on site.
References
Center for Chemical Process Safety. (2007). Guidelines for risk-based process safety. John Wiley & Sons.
Center for Chemical Process Safety. (2019). Guidelines for investigating process safety incidents (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Dekker, S. (2014). The field guide to understanding human error (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
Hollnagel, E. (2014). Safety-I and Safety-II: The past and future of safety management. Ashgate.
Hopkins, A. (2008). Failure to learn: The BP Texas City refinery disaster. CCH Australia.
International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. (2018). Life-saving rules (Report No. 459).
International Labour Organization. (2001). Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems (ILO-OSH 2001).
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 45001:2018 occupational health and safety management systems—Requirements with guidance for use.
Nwankwo, C. D., Arewa, A. O., Theophilus, S. C., & Ifelebuegu, A. O. (2022). Analysis of accidents caused by human factors in the oil and gas industry using the HFACS-OGI framework. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(3), 1642–1654. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1916238
Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge University Press.
Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate.
Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. BMJ, 320(7237), 768–770. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768
Shappell, S. A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Ashgate.
Theophilus, S. C., Esenowo, V. N., Arewa, A. O., Ifelebuegu, A. O., Nnadi, E. O., & Mbanaso, F. U. (2017). Human factors analysis and classification system for the oil and gas industry (HFACS-OGI). Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 167, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.036
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shihab Journal of Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shihab Journal of Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










